That means no server processors and no High-End Desktop (HEDT) processors either-so we won't be looking at either Threadrippers or the late model XE series Intel parts.Įven for someone like myself who lived through this entire period as a system builder, it's a giant pain in the butt assembling a list like this-let alone matching test results. Launch of AMD's Zen architecture, return of the Intel hex-core desktop CPUĪMD's Zen 2 architecture launches, Intel whiffs hard in the performance segmentĪMD's Zen 3 finally crushes Intel's long-held single-threaded performance recordĪlthough both Intel and AMD obviously launch a wide array of processors for different price points and target markets each year, we're limiting ourselves to the fastest desktop or "enthusiast" processor from each year. Strictly speaking, 2016 was an Intel whiff-Kaby Lake didn't actually launch until January 2017 AMD releases low-power APUs, but no successor to FX-9590 Intel's 5th generation Core dies stillborn. Intel abandons hex-core desktop CPUs-but few miss them, due to large single-threaded gainsĪMD's underwhelming FX-9590 launches-and it's Team Red's last enthusiast CPU for four long years Intel and AMD both introduce hex-core desktop CPUs Intel and AMD both launch the first true quad-core desktop CPUs Intel takes the undisputed performance lead here-and keeps it for a decade straight. Twenty years of enthusiast computing Year While we're at it, there are a couple of irregularities in the data we'll discuss those also and talk about the things that a simple chart won't show you. We thought it would be interesting to dive into archived performance benchmarks of the fastest desktop/enthusiast CPUs for each company to get a good overview of how each has really done over the years-and perhaps to even see if there are patterns to be gleaned or to make some bets about the future.īefore we dive into charts, let's start out with some tables-that way, you can see which CPUs we're using as milestones for each year. There's been no shortage of opinions about the current raw performance of each company's fastest processors, either. The comment wars between Intel and AMD fans have been hot for the last few release cycles, with a lot of digital ink spilled about which company has-or has not-improved significantly over the years. Moreover, only CPU processors are included, and no Silicon-based tech in the review.Aurich Lawson / Getty Images reader comments 266 with *The prices above are rounded off the the highest possible price, and does not include its starting offer from both companies. One of the top factors to consider is the affordability of both processors as it is a massive factor that concerns a user when browsing for new computer parts. After all the reviews and benchmark test, the use and need still matters, especially for making a costly purchase such as processor upgrades. According to Tom's Hardware, there are various factors which makes both companies' technology outshine the other and there should be points of consideration and personal needs to take note of, when buying one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |